https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149423 --- Comment #5 from Florian "der-flo" Lehner <dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> --- Hi Raphael! > > Is it really necessary to use your script? > > Yes. It's a post-release or snapshot from svn. The curious thing is that > there's no future upstream release after 0.66, though it's named 0.68 in svn > sources. See the content of file named VERSION that's read by both cmake (my > creation) and the binary as well. > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Snapshot_packages > I see your point. So far I didn't know about these upstream details. So it's ok. > > [!]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag > … > > > gnurobbo.x86_64: W: invalid-url URL: http://gnurobbo.sf.net/ <urlopen error timed out> > > I don't understand. The given URLs are working well for me. Maybe the > forwarding from sf.net is too slow for fedpkg. Please check your internet > settings. This was my misstake. I'm sorry. One more thing: warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/icons/hicolor See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#DuplicateFiles Cheers, Florian -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review