https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1085612 --- Comment #14 from Ye Myat Kaung <mavjs01@xxxxxxxxx> --- I've made a newer spec file that is similar to minetest - which is already in the fedora repos, and since voxelands is a fork of that. WIth this new spec file there is no need to pass the -DBUILD_SERVER=0, and it also builds the voxelands-server package. My only concern is that voxelands, like minetest bundles jthread, so, I an not sure I'd need to apply "Bundled Library Exception" with FPC. The issue is the same as the original Exception: https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/347 Do I still need to apply for "Bundled Library Exception" with FPC for voxelands, as well? A new stable version of voxelands (1409.00) was released some weekend ago. SPEC URL: https://mavjs.fedorapeople.org/voxelands/1409.00/voxelands.spec (This spec is used to build the voxelands packages on mavjs/voxelands on copr) SRPM URL: https://mavjs.fedorapeople.org/voxelands/1409.00/voxelands-1409.00-4.fc20.src.rpm SOURCE FILE URLs: https://mavjs.fedorapeople.org/voxelands/1409.00/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review