Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214967 ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm@xxxxxxxxxx 2007-04-28 21:58 EST ------- > The problem seems interesting but I've got a question. You've written that > lapack-devel doesn't exist on RHEL. So which package provides %{_libdir}/ > liblapack.so in RHEL? lapack itself, e.g. what I meant is that RHEL does have lapack, but hasn't split out the development files to lapack-devel, but the file dependency covers both. It's a packaging difference just in naming and subpackaging - at the end it's lapack bits that are being used in both cases. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review