https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=709328 Ivan Romanov <drizt@xxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(drizt@xxxxxxx) | --- Comment #98 from Ivan Romanov <drizt@xxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Rex Dieter from comment #95) > If you want this review to pass, options include: > * build iris packages from here, so they are shareable and usable elsewhere > (like kopete) see comment #83 , or > * use separate unbundled iris, which you seemed to prefer in comment #84 I am working on this. > but continuing to use a non-shared, bundled iris here is not an option. Yeah I know. Before I knew that all Kopete patches go to original iris. So now it is not a problem. Need only to put in order iris sources. Now Psi (I mean original Psi) seems uses some private iris headers. It's not a good. Also need to move some Psi+ iris patches to iris repo. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review