https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1099166 Rex Dieter <rdieter@xxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #29 from Rex Dieter <rdieter@xxxxxxxxxxxx> --- naming: ok license: ok sources: ok dff25a3e7593526390c695875f9c2ec0 screenFetch-dec1cd6c2471defe4459967fbc8ae15b55714338.tar.gz 1. SHOULD consider replacing in %files: %doc %{_mandir}/man1/screenfetch.1.gz with %{_mandir}/man1/screenfetch.1* man pages are automatically marked %doc, and the compressed filename is an implementation detail (ie, theoretically fedora could someday switch to uncompressed or bzip2-compressed manpages, and the build would fail). scriptlets: ok (N/A) macros: ok otherwise, fairly simple and clean. APPROVED (and sponsored). you can move on to the next steps of the process: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers#Add_Package_to_Source_Code_Management_.28SCM.29_system_and_Set_Owner Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 [Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a sponsor -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review