[Bug 231670] Review Request: librapi - Library to connect to Pocket PC devices

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: librapi - Library to connect to Pocket PC devices


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231670


bugzilla@xxxxxxxxxx changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Severity|normal                      |medium
           Priority|normal                      |medium

andreas.bierfert@xxxxxxxxxxxxx changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+




------- Additional Comments From andreas.bierfert@xxxxxxxxxxxxx  2007-04-27 04:46 EST -------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

 * OK: rpmlint output: W: librapi-devel no-documentation can be ignored
 * OK: package is named according to the guidelines
 * OK: spec file name matches base package name
 * OK: package meets packaging guidelines
 * OK: license
 * OK: license field matches actual license
 * OK: license is not included as own file and thus is not included in %doc
 * OK: Spec file seems to be in AE
 * OK: no obfuscated code spec
 * OK: sources match upstream:
1dcb43bbbb43688839c3b19de77b7b4e  synce-librapi-0.9.3.tar.gz
1dcb43bbbb43688839c3b19de77b7b4e 
/homes/awjb/rpmbuild/SOURCES/synce-librapi-0.9.3.tar.gz
 * OK: Builds fine on x86_64/fc6
 * OK: BR seem fine
 * OK: package has no locale support
 * OK: ldconfig is run on %post and $postun
 * OK: package is not explicitly designed to be relocatable
 * OK: package does not create any directories
 * OK: no duplicate files in file listing
 * OK: %defattr and permissions seem ok
 * OK: %clean section is present
 * OK: macros are used consistently
 * OK: content is ok
 * OK: no doc package needed
 * OK: %doc files do not affect runtime
 * OK: header files are in -devel
 * OK: no static libraries
 * OK: -devel requires pkgconfig
 * OK: .so file is in -devel
 * OK: -devel requires main package
 * OK: package does not contain .la archives
 * OK: no .desktop needed
 * OK: does not own files/directories from other packages
 * OK: buildroot is rm at beginning of install
 * OK: filenames seem to be valid utf8

c37a38cb27ecaa23c25f69a387c365fe  librapi-0.9.3-1.src.rpm
is APPROVED with this patch:


- --- librapi.spec.1	2007-03-09 22:57:51.000000000 +0100
+++ librapi.spec	2007-04-27 10:45:09.000000000 +0200
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
 BuildRoot:      %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
 
 BuildRequires:  libsynce-devel
+BuildRequires:  libtool
 
 # Provide an upgrade path from the monilithic synce package
 Provides:       synce = %{version}-%{release}
@@ -39,14 +40,14 @@
 
 %build
 %configure --disable-static --disable-rpath
- -make %{?_smp_mflags}
+make LIBTOOL=%{_bindir}/libtool %{?_smp_mflags}
 
 
 %install
 rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
 make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT
 
- -rm -f $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/*.la
+rm -f $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/*.{la,a}
 
 
 %clean
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFGMbhHQEQyPsWM8csRAjjSAJ9Orf2hkD8w4LboCZemvzedLWfqhgCeMl+Q
QUPL0R/omWuC3yccGNXa/Vs=
=kqk2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]