https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 --- Comment #80 from Paulo Andrade <paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andrade@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Milan Bouchet-Valat from comment #78) > Great! Thank you Paulo, and all the people who helped me finish this Julia > package, and by the way learn RPM packaging. :-) You're welcome :) > I've now removed objects.inv and added the .desktop file (I needed to > install icons to /usr/share/icons/ and to ship the SVG too to get a > good-looking icon in GNOME Shell). Ok. You can actually suggest upstream to provide a .desktop and icons for menus, but the scalable SVG should be better for most modern desktops. > A final question: would it be a good idea to make -common and -doc depend on > the base package, so that you remove all of them at the same time and don't > get version discrepancies? That would prevent installing the docs without Yes it should. Actually I did check that, but only verified that the -doc package was requiring the base one and did not fool proof check the others, so I did not notice that the -common was missing the requires. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review