https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 --- Comment #75 from Milan Bouchet-Valat <nalimilan@xxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Paulo Andrade from comment #74) > Good observation, now on my todo list whenever checking a package :) > Try this: [...] > > I personally rarely, if ever use "%doc NAME", to avoid surprises > with whatever rpm does behind the curtains, and also to make it > easier to make experimental partial builds. Thanks. Indeed the %doc directive feels pretty broken, it doesn't make any sense to include some files twice, especially since I only asked to include a few files, not any directory... > BTW, the install logic is really hard to follow, I strongly suggest > ensuring that "rpmbuild --short-circuit -bi" works. It is better for > you (the packager), but others may benefit if looking at your package. > I mean, use > (cd dir; commands) > or > pushd dir > commands > popd > to make it easier to know what is the current directory, if > necessary to add extra commands; usually one expects current > directory to be the builddir. > Avoid mv from builddir to buildroot, it just completely breaks > --short-circuit -bi Good idea. Looks like short-circuit works now. New version: Spec URL: http://nalimilan.perso.neuf.fr/transfert/julia.spec SRPM URL: http://nalimilan.perso.neuf.fr/transfert/julia-0.3.0-7.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review