[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517



--- Comment #71 from Milan Bouchet-Valat <nalimilan@xxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to Paulo Andrade from comment #70)
>   At first I only suggest this pseudo patch to the spec:
> 
> -rm -R %{buildroot}%{_docdir}/julia/html/_sources
> 
> Because there is that "big" "View page source" on every documentation
> page, that just leads to a page like this:
> "
> File not found
> 
> Firefox can't find the file at /usr/share/doc/julia/html/_sources/index.txt.
> 
>     Check the file name for capitalization or other typing errors.
>     Check to see if the file was moved, renamed or deleted.
> "
Good catch. I'll fix that.

> > OK, done. But now rpmlint grants me with a
> > julia.x86_64: W: dangerous-command-in-%post ln
> > julia.x86_64: W: dangerous-command-in-%postun rm
> 
>   I believe these can be ignored, as the end effect of not needing
> to install -devel packages should be better. But, can you provide a
> simple test case to exercise the julia interface to dlopen those?
> Just to make sure it works with only
> /usr/lib64/julia/libdSFMT.so that is, will not fail if
> /usr/lib64/libdSFMT.so is not available (as well as the other
> links).
The test suite already checks that AFAIK. But then I guess it's run when
dSFMT-devel is still installed, as it's the build environment. What exactly do
you have in mind?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]