[Bug 1142430] Review Request: vt323-fonts - VT323 font by Peter Hull

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1142430

Parag AN(पराग) <panemade@xxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Flags|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+



--- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) <panemade@xxxxxxxxx> ---
Review:

+ Package builds fine in mock in F22

+ rpmlint on generated rpms gave output
vt323-fonts.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US glyphs -> glyph,
glyph s
vt323-fonts.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US glyphs -> glyph, glyph
s
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.

+ source verified with upstream as (sha256sum)
packaged source:
472b60323f5d128e1edf71bf0b8e54de3ee98902fb1c68b813c58fd085e3e3a8
upstream source:
472b60323f5d128e1edf71bf0b8e54de3ee98902fb1c68b813c58fd085e3e3a8

+ License is OFL and included in its own text file OFL.txt

+ fontconfig file looks good

+ follows fonts packaging guidelines.

APPROVED.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]