Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DBIx-POS - Define a dictionary of SQL statements in a POD dialect (POS) Alias: perl-DBIx-POS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231774 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2007-04-26 11:53 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > So we have > > a) D::P - Artistic or GPL > b) C::S - Artistic > c) License Tag - Artistic or GPL > > If the license tag is Artistic or GPL, doens't it imply that the entire package > can be relicensed under the choice of Artistic or GPL? Nothing I see in > Artistic license for C::S allows that AFAICS. Ok, sold. (for some reason I had it in my head it was akin to BSD/MIT, using snippets is OK with attribution.) I'll change the license tag to Artistic, and take the licensing issue upstream for further resolution? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review