https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1138892 --- Comment #1 from Sergio Pascual <sergio.pasra@xxxxxxxxx> --- Just two things, * the BuildRequires for python2 is python2-devel instead of python-devel (to ease the future transition to python3) http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python#BuildRequires * The sphinx documentation bundles a copy of jquery. There is a global exception for bundling jquery, but you are required to add Provides: bundled(jquery) so that the package can be tracked in the future if (when) jquery is unbundled https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:No_Bundled_Libraries#Packages_granted_temporary_exceptions Apart of this, the package is fine Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed ===== MUST items ===== C/C++: [x]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]: Package contains no static executables. [-]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. [-]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown must be documented in the spec. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [-]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package do not use a name that already exist [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local Python: [x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process. [x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should provide egg info. [x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python [!]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel [x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [x]: Uses parallel make %{?_smp_mflags} macro. [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [-]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. [x]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [ ]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [-]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: Dist tag is present (not strictly required in GL). [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [-]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: python-gmpy2-2.0.3-1.fc22.x86_64.rpm python3-gmpy2-2.0.3-1.fc22.x86_64.rpm python-gmpy2-2.0.3-1.fc22.src.rpm python-gmpy2.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US gmpy -> gimpy, pygmy, Pygmy python-gmpy2.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/python-gmpy2/_static/jquery.js python3-gmpy2.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US gmpy -> gimpy, pygmy, Pygmy python3-gmpy2.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/python3-gmpy2/_static/jquery.js python-gmpy2.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US gmpy -> gimpy, pygmy, Pygmy 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings. Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- # rpmlint python-gmpy2 python3-gmpy2 python-gmpy2.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US gmpy -> gimpy, pygmy, Pygmy python-gmpy2.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/python-gmpy2/_static/jquery.js python3-gmpy2.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US gmpy -> gimpy, pygmy, Pygmy python3-gmpy2.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/python3-gmpy2/_static/jquery.js 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. # echo 'rpmlint-done:' Requires -------- python-gmpy2 (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): libc.so.6()(64bit) libgmp.so.10()(64bit) libmpc.so.3()(64bit) libmpfr.so.4()(64bit) libpthread.so.0()(64bit) libpython2.7.so.1.0()(64bit) python(abi) rtld(GNU_HASH) python3-gmpy2 (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): libc.so.6()(64bit) libgmp.so.10()(64bit) libmpc.so.3()(64bit) libmpfr.so.4()(64bit) libpthread.so.0()(64bit) libpython3.4m.so.1.0()(64bit) python(abi) rtld(GNU_HASH) Provides -------- python-gmpy2: python-gmpy2 python-gmpy2(x86-64) python3-gmpy2: python3-gmpy2 python3-gmpy2(x86-64) Unversioned so-files -------------------- python-gmpy2: /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/gmpy2.so python3-gmpy2: /usr/lib64/python3.4/site-packages/gmpy2.cpython-34m.so Source checksums ---------------- https://pypi.python.org/packages/source/g/gmpy2/gmpy2-2.0.3.zip : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : d2eab2d4024f13e9ab77e57636e51714b8a37fb9804024c92b48585701aa6b1a CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : d2eab2d4024f13e9ab77e57636e51714b8a37fb9804024c92b48585701aa6b1a Generated by fedora-review 0.5.2 (63c24cb) last change: 2014-07-14 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 1138892 -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: Python, Generic, Shell-api, C/C++ Disabled plugins: Java, SugarActivity, fonts, Haskell, Ocaml, Perl, R, PHP, Ruby Disabled flags: EXARCH, EPEL5, BATCH, DISTTAG -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review