https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1138330 --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(पराग) <panemade@xxxxxxxxx> --- We got naming issue resolved as "we don't need to add `google-` prefix". Review: + Package builds fine in mock in F22 - rpmlint on generated rpms gave output shadowsintolight-fonts.src: E: specfile-error warning: line 48: second %files 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. - source verified with upstream as (sha256sum) => Don't know how to download source archive + License is OFL and included in its own text file OFL.txt - fontconfig file looks good + follows fonts packaging guidelines except additional %files Suggestions: 1) if you execute rpm -E %_font_pkg you will see this macro already added %files. so you should remove %files written explicitly in spec file. 2) use cursive instead of handwriting in fontconfig file see more about this in /usr/share/fontconfig/templates/fontconfig-generics.txt 3) How do you created source archive? Maybe you should add comment above Source0: tag and write how one can obtain same tarball -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review