[Bug 1136972] Review Request: paflib - POWER Architecture facilities library

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1136972



--- Comment #6 from Rajalakshmi <raji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> ---
Thanks for the comments.

I removed static libraries and %defattr() definitions.

The reason to step to a different directory in configure and install is: 

The object directoy has to be different from source directory for paflib
considering the  following advantages.(GLIBC is also designed like this).

   -> It keeps the files generated during the build from cluttering up your
sources.
   -> It permits to remove the built files by simply removing the entire build
directory.
   -> It permits to build from the same sources with several sets of configure
options simultaneously.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]