https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1138610 Bug ID: 1138610 Summary: Review Request: xacml - SAML 2.0 profile of XACML v2.0 library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Reporter: dennisvd@xxxxxxxxx QA Contact: extras-qa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx CC: package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Spec URL: https://ndpfsvn.nikhef.nl/ro/mwsec/packaging/fedora/branches/rawhide/xacml.spec SRPM URL: http://software.nikhef.nl/dist/mwsec/rpm/testing/f20/SRPMS/xacml-1.5.0-1.fc20.src.rpm Description: (from the spec file:) This API provides a basic implementation of the SAML 2.0 profile of XACML v2.0, including support for obligations in XACML response messages. It aids in writing XACML clients and servers. More on the specification can be found here: http://docs.oasis-open.org/xacml/3.0/xacml-profile-saml2.0-v2-spec-en.html This package is a prerequisite for some authorisation software I intend to include later, such as SCAS, EES and argus-pep-api-c. For more information about this software, see http://wiki.nikhef.nl/grid/Site_Access_Control. This packaging was done earlier for the EU funded EGEE project; it carries a few historic obsoletes/provides in order to remain backward compatibility with other packages from this era. I've done a self-review of the software and I found no major trespasses (although I'm biased, of course. ;-) ) I will attach the review text. In summary, there are 4 rpmlint warnings which are fairly innocent: Checking: xacml-1.5.0-1.fc22.x86_64.rpm xacml-devel-1.5.0-1.fc22.x86_64.rpm xacml-1.5.0-1.fc22.src.rpm xacml.x86_64: W: name-repeated-in-summary C XACML (This is a false positive; XACML is the name of the standard as well as the package.) xacml-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib (Seems to occur when devel packages only contain the .so symlink to the full library.) xacml-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation (Yeah, there is none in the package.) xacml.src: W: name-repeated-in-summary C XACML 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. The spec file contains on occurrence of %define where %global should be used, but this is innocent and will be fixed in a future release. The package is aimed at Fedora as well as EPEL5 so we still include BuildRoot. Fedora Account System Username: dennisvd -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review