https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1133479 Christopher Meng <i@xxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|i@xxxxxxxx | --- Comment #4 from Christopher Meng <i@xxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Matthias Runge from comment #2) > Christopher, > > each package has (to have) a license. > > This is kind of hacky, but not forbidden. I know. I only focused on why the package was given a license GPL without license texts included. Now it's fine. ------------ Yoav, can't these conditional requirements be written into vdsm package itself? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review