https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1133217 --- Comment #5 from Martin Sourada <martin.sourada@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Pierre-YvesChibon from comment #4) > * Spec is clean > * License is CC-BY-SA > ! Why the strange %version tag? I guess I can see a relation with Fedora 21 > alpha, thus version is pre 21, but since the package is named f21, why not > just use 0.1 for alpha, 0.2 for beta and 1.0 for release? Just following the scheme from previous releases. It could be used for virtual versioned provides of system-backgrounds-gnome, etc.; we currently don't use that, but the possibility is there, with this versioning scheme. > ? You know probably better than I, but why is KDE having F21 while all the > other desktops have f21? > Again, for historical reasons. We are used to small caps, but back in the day when the -kde package used to be separate, they were using title case. Thus I keep using that for the F21 as well as we used it in previous releases with normal names. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review