https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1132691 --- Comment #6 from Susi Lehtola <susi.lehtola@xxxxxx> --- (In reply to Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) from comment #3) > [!]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. Fixed. > [!]: Package does not generate any conflict. > See generic names for tools Fixed. > [!]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. > Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} OpenMesh-bin Fixed > I would suggest to use -tools instead of -bin that is more significant. > Then you can add a version and arched Requires from tools to the main (libs.) > > Most tools are using generic names, this is a problem when installed into > /usr/bin/. I would suggest to move them into /usr/libexec/OpenMesh until > less generic names are found upstream. > At least for tools that might not be used by others packages. > > Also missing are desktop files for GUI tools. Fixed. http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/OpenMesh.spec http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/OpenMesh-3.2-2.fc20.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review