https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1131543 --- Comment #5 from Pierre-YvesChibon <pingou@xxxxxxxxxxxx> --- > => python-Flask-XML-RPC.spec should be python-flask-xml-rpc.spec > See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Spec_file_name Adjusted. > - License text is not included in package > => see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#License_Text > which suggests MIT license package needs license text also. > Ask upstream to provide license text This has been done already: https://bitbucket.org/leafstorm/flask-xml-rpc/pull-request/1/ (Thus the commented LICENSE in the %files section) > => Directory /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/flaskext not owned That one is used by every flask extension. Adjusted. Spec URL: http://pingou.fedorapeople.org/RPMs//python-Flask-XML-RPC.spec SRPM URL: http://pingou.fedorapeople.org/RPMs//python-flask-xml-rpc-0.1.2-2.fc20.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review