[Bug 1117209] Review Request: sscep - Simple SCEP client with modifications for engine support & more

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1117209

Rex Dieter <rdieter@xxxxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)     |
              Flags|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+



--- Comment #27 from Rex Dieter <rdieter@xxxxxxxxxxxx> ---
$ rpmlint *.src */*.rpm
(none): E: no installed packages by name *.src
sscep.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary sscep
sscep.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mkrequest
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.

Looks good now, thanks.


APPROVED (and sponsored).


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841
[Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a
sponsor
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]