[Bug 233783] Review Request: vegastrike-data - Data files for Vega Strike

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: vegastrike-data - Data files for Vega Strike


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233783


peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+




------- Additional Comments From peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx  2007-04-23 21:12 EST -------
(In reply to comment #2)
> Yes, I saw those warnings before submission myself too, but I've deliberately
> ignored them, as I think these empty files might still be needed / usefull.
That's OK, then.

> >  (2) As-is, it seems to include its own locally-modified copy of various Python
> > modules (modules/builtin/). A brief perusal of the diff between the included
> > python modules and the system copies of them shows mostly variable renaming and
> > similar generally-insignificant changes.
> >  
> 
> Good catch, removed.

Thanks! :]
 
> Notice these are data files, not user docs, and I think the game might actually
> expect / depend on them being ISO-8859, so I've kept these as is.
That's acceptable, then; though it should be brought to the attention of the
upstream devs. UTF-8 is so much nicer than having to worry about codepages and
stuff. ;)


> These are just 2 of a long list of in game fake advertisements, which are there
> to create a certain atmosphere. I personally find the ones about guns and
> joining the army / the ones promoting militarism much more offensive then the 2
> you name. IOW this is pretty subjective. Removing any of them feels like
> applying censorship to me, and lets please not go there unless things are
> clearly illegal or really bad taste / inappropriate 
I agree. Someone from FESCo would need to make the final yea or nay, though if
it came down to it. OK as-is.

> Most of these were in the builtin dir, the remaining 2 are really scripts meant
> to be executed stand alone, and thus should be executable.
> 
Thanks for the clarification, then. 

With the fixes applied as you've mentioned, vegastrike-data 0.4.3-2 is APPROVED.  


> I only updated the specfile as the sources didn't change and it takes eons to
> upload it with my link.
Highly understandable - it takes eons to download it, even. ^_^ Though that's a
problem with most large game-data packages. 



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]