https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1086406 --- Comment #5 from David Shea <dshea@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #4) > - The directories > /usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages,/usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/ > __pycache__, > /usr/lib/python3.4 are owned by python3-* packages. I'm not sure what you're trying to say here. The python3-nose-testconfig does not own these directories, nor should it, since they are common to all python3 packages and owned by python3-libs. $ rpm -q --filesbypkg -p RPMS/noarch/python3-nose-testconfig-0.9-2.fc22.noarch.rpm python3-nose-testconfig /usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/__pycache__/testconfig.cpython-34.pyc python3-nose-testconfig /usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/__pycache__/testconfig.cpython-34.pyo python3-nose-testconfig /usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/nose_testconfig-0.9-py3.4.egg-info python3-nose-testconfig /usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/nose_testconfig-0.9-py3.4.egg-info/PKG-INFO python3-nose-testconfig /usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/nose_testconfig-0.9-py3.4.egg-info/SOURCES.txt python3-nose-testconfig /usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/nose_testconfig-0.9-py3.4.egg-info/dependency_links.txt python3-nose-testconfig /usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/nose_testconfig-0.9-py3.4.egg-info/entry_points.txt python3-nose-testconfig /usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/nose_testconfig-0.9-py3.4.egg-info/top_level.txt python3-nose-testconfig /usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/testconfig.py python3-nose-testconfig /usr/share/doc/python3-nose-testconfig python3-nose-testconfig /usr/share/doc/python3-nose-testconfig/ACKS python3-nose-testconfig /usr/share/doc/python3-nose-testconfig/LICENSE-2.0 python3-nose-testconfig /usr/share/doc/python3-nose-testconfig/TODO python3-nose-testconfig /usr/share/doc/python3-nose-testconfig/index.txt $ rpm -qf /usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/ python3-libs-3.4.1-12.fc21.x86_64 > - This package contains a License file separated from upstream. This issue > has been already pointed out to the developer. > (https://bitbucket.org/jnoller/nose-testconfig/issue/10/add-licensing- > information-to-python-file) > > Please, leave a comment just above Source1 tag. Will do. > > - Why do you not define a 'with_python3' conditional macro like that adviced > on Packaging guidelines for Python code? > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python#Building_more_than_once Because this macro is pointless. As it states in that very section, "Once python 3 support has been added to a package, you must leave it enabled." And since it's a small noarch package, building the python3 support doesn't even take particularly long, so there's no point in ever turning it off. Even adding it just with EPEL support in mind would necessitate further changes once python3 is added to EPEL-7. New package with the Source1 comment: Spec URL: https://dshea.fedorapeople.org/python-nose-testconfig/0.9-3/python-nose-testconfig.spec SRPM URL: https://dshea.fedorapeople.org/python-nose-testconfig/0.9-3/python-nose-testconfig-0.9-3.fc22.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review