Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wise2 - Bioinformatics tools for comparison of biopolymers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236158 panemade@xxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade@xxxxxxxxx 2007-04-23 07:24 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 0584240f77885e37528e99e64535ab60 wise2.2.0.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Provides: config(wise2) = 2.2.0-2.fc7 + Requires: config(wise2) = 2.2.0-2.fc7 libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libm.so.6 libm.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) rtld(GNU_HASH) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review