https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1127212 Alan Pevec <apevec@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(apevec@xxxxxxxxxx | |) | --- Comment #6 from Alan Pevec <apevec@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Kashyap Chamarthy from comment #4) > About Requiring Base Package[1], shouldn't the '%package doc section require > something like (no _isa since this is noarch package)? > > Requires: %{name}= %{version}-%{release} No, -doc really doesn't require anything from base package, it's optional documentation which can stand alone. e.g. there could be a use-case to install documentation only for local browsing. So SHOULD item is not applicable: [-]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review