https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=808350 Daniel E. Wilson <danw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(danw@xxxxxxxxxxxx | |g) | --- Comment #55 from Daniel E. Wilson <danw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #54) > Hi D, > > I will close this review and submit my work to the queue after 1 week(one > year after your last comment) because in more than 2 years you still stay in > stage NEEDSPONSOR. > > This is ridiculous if racket can't be included in Fedora as someone can't > continue packaging it. At last someone is as frustrated as I am about this. Among other things, I have been working seven days a week for the last couple of months. This in itself would not have stopped me but evidence has been mounting for some that this was going nowhere. Given the increasing demands on my time and my inability to submit my work to the queue, it is irrational for me to put a high priority on this. There are two things that I am curious about. First, where did you get the idea that removing a program from a system as big as racket is a good idea? Making a users life more difficult strikes me as the sort of thing that Debian would do, one of the reasons I no longer use that distribution. Debian goes out their way to make things hard on their users. Second is what led you to the solution with the *.zo files. Bottom line is that as long as I am unable to submit my build I see no reason to spend any more time working on this. If this changes then I will be happy to continue, otherwise someone else will have to do it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review