https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1126100 --- Comment #9 from Tait Clarridge <tait@xxxxxxxxxxxx> --- Don't worry, I read all the messages so far as lighthearted and friendly assistance :) Mine were too, just emphasizing the gratefulness for the help and pointers because of the importance of packaging correctly. Sorry if mine came off as combative, they were not meant to be! As for some packaging questions: For the disco dependencies, they use specific versions of erlang modules and thus were put into a special directory. Would it be OK if I follow the erlang package in putting disco code into /usr/lib64/erlang/lib/disco-%{version} where normal packages have the directory structure of /{ebin,include,priv,src} but disco would be /master/{deps,ebin}? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review