https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123654 --- Comment #14 from Florian "der-flo" Lehner <dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #13) > It's better to include the changelog in debian/ from git There is only one thing, the license text, that must be included in %doc. And directly copied from the spec-file: %doc COPYING Everything else should be but mustn't be included. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Documentation > [...] I didn't submit it to the review > because this Ubuntu guy has written many freaks of XXXstat and none of these > really do something new. It's about diversity. There is a lot of software doing the exact same thing. But they all do/present it in a different way and that's the important point. > This is not a blocker as I'm not the reviewer, and please understand the > difference between "software changelog" and "package changelog". Where did you mentioned the software changelog in the comments above? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review