https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1114212 --- Comment #5 from František Dvořák <valtri@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #4) > (In reply to František Dvořák from comment #3) > > Do you think I should limit the permissions anyway? The files created by > > gLite daemons in /var/spool/glite have 0600 permissions, so additional > > listing permissions on directory couldn't be a problem... > > Actually in BSD systems, 600 is common, no need to set if you've done the > right thing. ;) > "no need to set" sounds good to me. ;-) What do you think about new spec (not touching the permissions by spec file)? > > > 2. install -m 0644 ChangeLog LICENSE %{buildroot}%{_pkgdocdir} > > > > > > Why not %doc? > > > > > > > It is due to EPEL support. There is something installed in /usr/share/doc > > already by 'make install' and EPEL 6 doesn't handle combination of already > > existing files and %doc very well. > > Using rm -frv %{buildroot}%{_docdir} at the end of %install and %doc is > better, also %_pkgdocdir is unavailable on EPEL. OK, it simplifies the packaging and spec is more readable (though I need to be more careful when upgrading - new files won't be catched by build failures). Spec URL: http://scientific.zcu.cz/fedora/glite-lb-server-3.0.18-3/glite-lb-server.spec SRPM URL: http://scientific.zcu.cz/fedora/glite-lb-server-3.0.18-3/glite-lb-server-3.0.18-3.fc22.src.rpm koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7232959 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review