https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1126045 David Dick <ddick@xxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ddick@xxxxxxxx --- Comment #1 from David Dick <ddick@xxxxxxxx> --- There are licensing terms in lib/IO/Pager/Buffered.pm lib/IO/Pager/Page.pm lib/IO/Pager/Unbuffered.pm lib/IO/Pager.pm README All of them offer the package under a license that upstream seems to have created OR under "GPL+ or Artistic". I suggest you take the "GPL+ or Artistic" license option. It looks like (from your SPEC/SRPM urls) you are building for EPEL. Are you planning to build for EPEL5 or is EPEL6/EPEL7 good enough? The Changelog mentions "David E. Wheeler" when it has to mention you. The %description tag mentions (see "NOTES") which is not useful as you have not included the "NOTES" section in the spec file. Please re-write this section. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review