https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=972348 --- Comment #3 from Rich Mattes <richmattes@xxxxxxxxx> --- I don't think it's necessary. I've been using a virtual provides for ros-%{name} with the other packages (e.g. catkin). I think it's might be better to leave it as actionlib and use the virtual provides for ros-actionlib to be consistent. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review