https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1102858 --- Comment #9 from Jerry James <loganjerry@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #8) > - This package seems licensed with a BSD (modification variant > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:BSD?rd=Licensing/ > BSD#Modification_Variant) > Can you confirm ? Yes, that is correct. Since this is not one of the BSD variants that requires a distinct License tag (such as "BSD with advertising"), the license tag is just "BSD" anyway. > - Your package owns /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/repoze > and /usr/lib/python3.3/site-packages/repoze directories; they are co-owned > by other packages not required. It is true that other packages own those directories, too, but this package can be installed without any of those other packages. Therefore, this package must also own those directories. > Your package does not own directories created > /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/repoze/sphinx > /usr/lib/python3.3/site-packages/repoze/sphinx > > Please, explicit files/directories lists in '%files'. Not needed, since the parent directories, and everything they contain, are already owned. > - %if 0%{?fedora} >= 12 || 0%{?rhel} >= 8 > > RHEL 8 ? This was requested by the original reviewer. See the attachment in comment 1. It doesn't matter much to me, frankly, but this does offer a bit of future-proofing, since python3 support is likely to appear in RHEL 8. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review