https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1076976 --- Comment #7 from František Dvořák <valtri@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Josef Stribny from comment #6) > > Yes, it is, except EPEL6. Moved rspec-core BR into sl6 macro block. > > Try not to get lost in all those macros. Sometimes it's better to have > different specs in more branches as the specs with a lot of conditionals > cannot be easily upgraded by automatic scripts/tools and might be difficult > for packagers doing OS wide fixes to deal with. But that's just up to you. > True, I've already though about separating at least the EPEL6 changes... I'll probably throw all the differences to the branches, there will be also the %check exception for EPEL7. > As this gem doesn't have any C extension I would probably remove the gem2rpm > comment as misleading. Otherwise the fixes has been made, the package > builds, installs, runs ==> APPROVING. OK. Thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review