[Bug 1116018] Review Request: rubygem-ansi - ruby ansi

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116018

Steve Traylen <steve.traylen@xxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Flags|needinfo?(steve.traylen@cer |
                   |n.ch)                       |



--- Comment #2 from Steve Traylen <steve.traylen@xxxxxxx> ---

(In reply to Christos Triantafyllidis from comment #1)

> 
> To sum up:
> - The only part I'd like to re-visit is the existence of the license file.

The LICENSE.txt file is added after the 1.4.3, I'll add the file for sure
with the next release. The COPYING.rdoc file is present now. 


> - The gems should require rubygems package

Indeed, added for el6,7 and fc19,20, it's automatic with 21.

> - I checked everything on fc20, I see that you include conditionals for el6,
> do you want this to land in EPEL repos too? Are you going to go back to el5
> (didn't see any reference to it)? I'd like to do a sanity check on el5/6 if
> you plan to build it for them.

Will not do 5 but will do 6 and 7.

> Cheers,
> Christos

Spec URL: http://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/rubygem-ansi/rubygem-ansi.spec
SRPM URL:
http://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/rubygem-ansi/rubygem-ansi-1.4.3-2.fc20.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]