https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1113328 --- Comment #5 from Sergio Pascual <sergio.pasra@xxxxxxxxx> --- There is a problem with the ioflo script in /usr/bin. Both python3-ioflo and python-ioflo install ioflo in /usr/bin, but is the python2 version what appears in both packages. That means that python3-ioflo installs python2, what is wrong. More about this problem here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python?rd=Packaging/Python#Executables_in_.2Fusr.2Fbin Apart from this, * there is a typo in the Summary, programing should be programming * the files ioflo/app/test/example.py and ioflo/app/test/testStart.py have a /usr/bin/env in the first line. This is generally useless in library code. I usually remove it with sed -i -e '1d' $file in %pre, and then file a bug upstream * the tarball in pypi has a lot less files than in the github repository. License and docs are there but not in the tarball. This is probably a problem of packaging, files are missing in MANIFEST.in. I suggest you fill a bug about this, so that the future tarballs of ioflo come with its license -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review