https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1107127 --- Comment #7 from Dave Love <d.love@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Michael Schwendt from comment #5) > > I notice that the RPM tries to use the user dlove. > > It would be similar with your own src.rpm packages, because it's entirely > normal for the included files to be owned by the user that builds the > src.rpm, e.g. "mockbuild" or your ordinary user account. Yes, and presumably the version that's eventually distributed will be different anyhow. The tarball will have arbitrary file ownerships too. > %doc > > An empty %doc line makes no sense, since it's a no-op. Thanks. It wasn't meant to be empty. > > %{_mandir}/man1/procenv.1.gz > > Not a big issue, but prefer > > %{_mandir}/man1/procenv.1* > > to allow for disabled/changed/customized compression of manual pages. Yes, that's what I do these days. Now I've got space there, I've uploaded new versions to: https://loveshack.fedorapeople.org/review/procenv-0.35-3.el6.src.rpm https://loveshack.fedorapeople.org/review/procenv.spec -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review