[Bug 1107127] Review Request: procenv - Utility to show process environment

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1107127



--- Comment #7 from Dave Love <d.love@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to Michael Schwendt from comment #5)
> > I notice that the RPM tries to use the user dlove.
> 
> It would be similar with your own src.rpm packages, because it's entirely
> normal for the included files to be owned by the user that builds the
> src.rpm, e.g. "mockbuild" or your ordinary user account.

Yes, and presumably the version that's eventually distributed will be
different anyhow.  The tarball will have arbitrary file ownerships too.

> %doc
> 
> An empty %doc line makes no sense, since it's a no-op.

Thanks.  It wasn't meant to be empty.

> > %{_mandir}/man1/procenv.1.gz
> 
> Not a big issue, but prefer
> 
>   %{_mandir}/man1/procenv.1*
> 
> to allow for disabled/changed/customized compression of manual pages.

Yes, that's what I do these days.  Now I've got space there, I've uploaded new
versions to:

https://loveshack.fedorapeople.org/review/procenv-0.35-3.el6.src.rpm
https://loveshack.fedorapeople.org/review/procenv.spec

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]