https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1119947 --- Comment #3 from Michael Schwendt <bugs.michael@xxxxxxx> --- A quick look at the spec file: > %doc To be deleted. An empty %doc line makes no sense. It's a no-op. > %{_bindir}/* Sort of sloppy packaging, because this would include anything in the package and would even accept a missing %{_bindir}/%{name} executable. Please be a little more explicit about which files to include, also to increase clearness/comprehensibility of the spec file. A compromise would be to do %{_bindir}/%{name}* %{_bindir}/mpp* with the caveat that it would also not fail for an absent %{_bindir}/%{name} file (or other files people expect to be available). Ideal would be to either spell out all files you never want to be missing, or to add a guard that verifies whether e.g. %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/%{name} is available. The %install or %check section is suitable for that. > %{_mandir}/* Here the brevity leads to including too many subdirs of %{_mandir}, which belong into the "filesystem" package already and must not be included in your package: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#File_and_Directory_Ownership > %{_datadir}/makepp/* > %{_defaultdocdir}/makepp/* https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:UnownedDirectories -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review