[Bug 237344] Review Request: supervisor - System for Allowing the Control of Process State on UNIX

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: supervisor -  System for Allowing the Control of Process State on UNIX


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237344





------- Additional Comments From toshio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx  2007-04-20 18:32 EST -------
Created an attachment (id=153225)
 --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=153225&action=view)
Spec patch with two changes

Initial spec file patch with two changes:

1) Use python_sitelib to get the directory to install the files.  This works on
multilib machines like x86_64.

2) Rename the init script from supervisor to supervisord (I renamed this in
Source1 as well which means you'll want to rename the actual file.)  This makes
the lock file and the init script match which makes rpmlint happy.  I'm not
cetain that it's necessary but
http://www.mail-archive.com/cooker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg18193.html indicates
that SysVinit may need the names to match in order to properly decide whether
to start services when changing runlevel.

Full review to follow.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]