[Bug 236798] Review Request: ballz - Platform game with some puzzle elements

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: ballz - Platform game with some puzzle elements


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236798


musuruan@xxxxxxxxx changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+




------- Additional Comments From musuruan@xxxxxxxxx  2007-04-20 15:41 EST -------
 - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines. OK
 - Spec file matches base package name.	OK
 - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK
 - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK
 - License: BSD
 - License field in spec matches. OK
 - License file included in package. OK
 - Spec in American English. OK
 - Spec is legible. OK
 - Sources match upstream. OK md5sum: 1a98a0a87985f2425d2fde5715be50ed 

 - Package needs ExcludeArch. N/A
 - BuildRequires correct. OK.
 - Spec handles locales/find_lang. N/A
 - Package is relocatable and has a reason to be. N/A
 - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK
 - Package has a correct %clean section. OK
 - Package has correct buildroot. OK
 - Package is code or permissible content. OK
 - Doc subpackage needed/used. N/A
 - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK

 - Headers/static libs in -devel subpackage. N/A
 - Spec has needed ldconfig in post and postun. N/A
 - .pc files in -devel subpackage/requires pkgconfig. N/A
 - .so files in -devel subpackage. N/A
 - -devel package Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}. N/A
 - .la files are removed. N/A

 - Package is a GUI app and has a .desktop file. OK

 - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK fc6/i386
 - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK
 - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK
 - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK
 - No rpmlint output. OK
 - final provides and requires are sane:
	/bin/sh  
	/bin/sh  
	hicolor-icon-theme  
	libaldmb-0.9.3.so  
	liballeg.so.4.2  
	libdumb-0.9.3.so  
	libguichan-0.6.1.so  
	libguichan_allegro-0.6.1.so  
	rtld(GNU_HASH)  

SHOULD Items:

 - Should build in mock. OK fc6/i386
 - Should function as described. OK
 - Should have sane scriptlets. OK
 - Should have subpackages require base package with fully versioned depend. N/A
 - Should have dist tag. OK
 - Should package latest version. OK

Issues:

1. Not a blocker, but on the PC I used for the review, the viewport was not
   centered at fullscreen. BTW, why did you patched the sources to use
   fullscreen instead of the default window mode?

APPROVED.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]