https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062942 --- Comment #22 from Christopher Meng <i@xxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Jon Ciesla from comment #21) > That's a bit harsh, Christopher. It's mostly to provide a way to display an > unserstanding of the Packaging Guidelines and the review process. @Jon: No. I didn't point to this one. But the fact is, some are sponsored within 3 days, some need to wait at least 3 months but still get no feedbacks. And actually some among these 3+3 are not even eligible to being as a packager, they just do a trivial python module which is not required by any packages else, or a perl one line script review and pretend to be a guru. I don't want to start any flamewars here, but Fedora should really revise the guidelines to attract more devs instead of users to the packager group. Thanks to the @fedoraproject addr is not restricted like Debian or Gentoo, or more craps will come. @Fabio: Drop find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -depth -type d -exec rmdir {} 2>/dev/null \; This has been fixed in MakeMakers for years. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review