[Bug 226474] Merge Review: systemtap

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: systemtap


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226474





------- Additional Comments From dsmith@xxxxxxxxxx  2007-04-20 12:17 EST -------
There are no rpmlint warnings output on systemtap-runtime-0.5.13-1.fc6.i386.rpm.

There are 3 classes of rpmlint warnings on systemtap-0.5.13-1.fc6.i386.rpm:

- W: systemtap devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/share/systemtap/runtime/*.[ch] (48 instances)

Since the systemtap package is basically a code generator/compiler,
these warnings can be ignored.  Those files could be put in a devel rpm, but the
main rpm would always have to require the devel rpm, making the separation
pointless.

- W: systemtap spurious-executable-perm
/usr/share/doc/systemtap-0.5.13/examples/small_demos/* (13 instances)

rpmlint doesn't like the fact that the systemtap package includes
several demo scripts that are marked as executable.

- W: systemtap doc-file-dependency
/usr/share/doc/systemtap-0.5.13/examples/socktop /bin/bash (1 instance)

rpmlint doesn't like the fact that the systemtap package includes
one demo script that is a bash script.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]