[Bug 1055378] Review Request: icinga - Open Source host, service and network monitoring program

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1055378



--- Comment #38 from Shawn Starr <shawn.starr@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
Wrt to %ghost this comes from:

https://dev.icinga.org/issues/4517

If the permissions for the symlink don't need to be 777 then 640 would be fine
both.

But this goes away if we just bundle w/o the symlink and provide additional
documentation on setting up ido2db.

For the latter, I would agree, the DSOs and binaries are identical. I think the
typical Fedora/RHEL approach is documentation for the user to switch the
symlink themselves?

We can provide both configs but it's up to the user to set ido2db to use the
respective backend. 

Thoughts?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]