Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DBIx-POS - Define a dictionary of SQL statements in a POD dialect (POS) Alias: perl-DBIx-POS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231774 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson@xxxxxxxxxxxx 2007-04-19 22:58 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > that is, that fragments of code licensed under the Artistic license may be > reliscensed under the GPL (as would be the case if someone opted to use this > package under the terms of the GPL). This is where I don't quite follow you. What part of the Artistic license allows this? And why would you consider the portion under the Artistic license a "fragment"? Note: I think we both understand that this is not a blocker on the package itself because mixing these two licenses is certainly compatible. It's just a matter of getting the tag to reflect the realistic licensing of the package as a whole. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review