https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1119087 --- Comment #6 from Florian "der-flo" Lehner <dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Sergio Pascual from comment #5) > Yes, this is a packaging error, I have reported it > > https://github.com/alecthomas/voluptuous/issues/80 > > I can use the zip from github instead. I will post a new spec What about using the tarball from github? Source0: http://github.com/alecthomas/voluptuous/archive/%{version}.tar.gz#/%{upname}-%{version}.tar.gz > > > > [!]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory > > > > names). > > > > > > > > ---> Please replace rm with %{__rm} and cp with %{__install} > > > > > > > > > > This guideline is a about directory names, not command names. If fact, from > > > the guidelines: > > > > > > Macro forms of system executables SHOULD NOT be used except when there is a > > > need to allow the location of those executables to be configurable. For > > > example, rm should be used in preference to %{__rm}, but %{__python} is > > > acceptable. > > > > Furthermore, it states: > > Having macros in a Source: or Patch: line is a matter of style. Some people > > enjoy the ready readability of a source line without macros. Others prefer > > the ease of updating for new versions when macros are used. > > > > And rpm --eval %{__rm} still works. > > > > I do not follow you here. Sorry! My mistake - you are right -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review