[Bug 1116238] Review Request: openstack-tempest-icehouse - set of integration tests to be run against a live OpenStack cluster

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116238

Steve Linabery <slinaber@xxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Flags|                            |needinfo?(p@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)



--- Comment #12 from Steve Linabery <slinaber@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
I created a POC openstack-tempest RPM that has two subpackages,
openstack-tempest-icehouse and openstack-tempest-juno. I'd appreciate some
sanity checking of the spec.

http://slinabery.fedorapeople.org/openstack-tempest-20140703-2.fc20.src.rpm

NB: The Source1 for the juno tarball does not point to an actual upstream
tarball. I merely retarred the icehouse tarball indicated in Source0. In
practice, I think we'd tag (in https://github.com/redhat-openstack/tempest) the
icehouse branch and the juno branch with tags that reflect the Version, for
example 'openstack-tempest-icehouse-20140703' and
'openstack-tempest-juno-20140703'. At this point there is no 'juno' branch in
redhat-openstack/tempest, but I used the ginned-up Source1 tarball to show how
we would handle subpackages. If we go forward with this strategy, the initial
cut will have only the icehouse tarball.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]