Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: distcc -- A free distributed C/C++ compiler system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174883 bugzilla@xxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fedora_extras@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2007-04-19 11:47 EST ------- (In reply to comment #26) > 3) What does release_func accomplish? It obfusticates the fact that the release > tag violates policy. It should be a single integer followed by the release tag, > unless you're bumping an old tree in which case you can add a number after the > release tag. Actually, if %release_func is not defined, the default %release_func: %global release_func() %1%{?dist} seems to do the right thing. However, that macro is obfuscating. It should be removed from the spec file, and Release: should be: Release: 6%{?dist} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review