https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1115894 --- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen <petersen@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Philip Withnall from comment #3) > > There is no License file included in the tarball. > > Can you please contact the author about adding one upstream? > > https://github.com/vasylp/hgettext/issues/5 Thanks! > > What is /usr/bin/hgettext for? Probably it should live > > in ghc-hgettext-devel not ghc-hgettext, since it looks like > > a devel tool not something needed at runtime. > > I was treating it the same as /usr/bin/gettext which comes from the gettext > package, rather than gettext-devel. I see. /usr/bin/gettext can be used by shell scripts at runtime. I am not sure about the use case for /usr/bin/hgettext. Is it used by project maintainers for extracting strings to be translated or are you saying it could be used at runtime? If it is the former kind of tool then I think it should really live in ghc-hgettext-devel, since consumer packages of hgettext would just use libHShgettext. > > I think a better package Summary might be "Haskell binding to libintl". > > Done. Thanks > If you're OK with the hgettext binary remaining in the non-devel package, > I'll request a git repo and start turning the fedpkg wheel (with the summary > change and no licence file). Otherwise I can do another iteration of the > spec file here with more Koji scratch builds. Given there are few changes it would be nice to see the final packaging here I feel. I can approve once that is done: so you probably don't need to do all the scratch builds again. Thanks -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review