[Bug 236642] Review Request: Revisor - Revisor GUI

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: Revisor - Revisor GUI


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236642





------- Additional Comments From jspaleta@xxxxxxxxx  2007-04-19 02:06 EST -------
You really really really need to do something about the SOURCE tag as mentioned
in comment #2. 

Since the source tarball is being generated from a source control system (git in
this case if im reading the revisor development webpages correctly) and its not
available at an established static URL address as an identifiable 'release' then
the spec file must contain a comment blog which details the actual steps that
need to be taken to pull the appropriated tagged git entity and then repackage
it as a tarball. 

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL has an example of how to do a
comment block for a public svn server. You should do something similar for your
git tree.

I cannot initiate a formal review if I can't confirm that the md5sum of the
tarball is as it should be.

-jef

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]