[Bug 1116238] Review Request: openstack-tempest-icehouse - set of integration tests to be run against a live OpenStack cluster

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116238

Steve Linabery <slinaber@xxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Flags|needinfo?(slinaber@redhat.c |
                   |om)                         |



--- Comment #5 from Steve Linabery <slinaber@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
I edited the spec and built new srpm. Updates to spec/srpm address LICENSE (was
incorrect license type in spec, also added as %doc in %files).

Remaining rpmlint errors:
1) openstack-tempest-icehouse.noarch: E: zero-length
/usr/share/openstack-tempest-icehouse/etc/whitelist.yaml

Is this a blocker for review? Upstream says this is a data file that might
contain data eventually, but is currently empty.

2) openstack-tempest-icehouse.noarch: E: non-executable-script
/usr/share/openstack-tempest-icehouse/tempest/stress/cleanup.py 0644L
/usr/bin/env

I pinged upstream and this is fixed in:
https://github.com/redhat-openstack/tempest/commit/84e793ff9be936876edc5ba587b1cb7fc19b2c59

If the package is approved, I can rebase to a new tarball including this fix.
Or should I submit a new spec/srpm that includes this fix?

I believe the 'manual' items listed in the output of fedora-review are correct
in the latest versions of spec/srpm.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]