https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1097426 --- Comment #38 from Neil Horman <nhorman@xxxxxxxxxx> --- The ticket is closed because the package is integrated into fedora, so theres no need to keep it open any more. The CFLAGS issue is a tricky one. Ville wants me to do a few things, chief among them build the dpdk with the RPM_OPT_FLAGS macro. This is a large set of compiler flags that is used to enforce security policy in fedora built packages. Unfortunately doing so has several problems, among them the fact that several compiler flags in RPM_OPT_FLAGS conflict with compiler flags that the dpdk build sets internally. Add to that the EXTRA_CFLAGS macro doesn't seem to apply to all sources, and doesn't always parse properly, leading a large series of breaks in the build (both at compile time, and in the package). When Ville says I don't care, I'm really just not that worried about it, given that the Fedora DPDK is an unoptimized build for which there is general consensus that no one will build a product out of the package without a complete rebuild of the libraries anyway. I've not managed to compile a complete list of build breaks for adding RPM_OPT_FLAGS yet, but if you want to take a look, you are more than welcome to. I'm on vacation for the next week, but will be checking my email if you have questions on how to do anything. Otherwise I'll get back to this once I get home. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review