https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1115885 --- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen <petersen@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Philip Withnall from comment #3) > > - contact the maintainer to ask if he might consider changing > > to a liberal FOSS license instead of Public Domain > > Why is that? From what I can see of Legal:Main and Packaging:Guidelines, > public domain is a good, FSF-compatible way of licencing something. What > would be the reason for relicencing? from https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main#Good_Licenses "Being in the public domain is not a license; rather, it means the material is not copyrighted and no license is needed." Also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#Public_Domain I think earlier Fedora Legal was a bit ambivalent about Public Domain, since some jurisdictions do not allow Public Domain, but it looks like this may no longer be the case. So probably you can ignore this suggestion. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review